Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman
This text of Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman (Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Nicholas Pittman, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), dated July 13, 2015, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to be restored to possession and for other relief in a holdover summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Order (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), dated July 13, 2015, affirmed, without costs.
The hearing evidence, fairly interpreted, supports the court's finding that tenant breached the parties' probationary stipulation in this chronic rent delinquency holdover proceeding, by making several late payments, as well as payments for less than the stipulated amount. In this posture, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of tenant's application for post-eviction relief (see Wadsworth Ventura Assoc. v Frias, 101 AD3d 474 [2012]; Henry Hudson Gardens, L.L.C. v Bareda, 25 AD3d 466 [2006]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: April 22, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fourth-lenox-terrace-assoc-v-pittman-nyappterm-2016.