Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 22, 2016·No. 2016 NYSlipOp 50638(U)·Published

Opinion



Fourth Lenox Terrace Associates, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,

against

Nicholas Pittman, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.


Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), dated July 13, 2015, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to be restored to possession and for other relief in a holdover summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), dated July 13, 2015, affirmed, without costs.

The hearing evidence, fairly interpreted, supports the court's finding that tenant breached the parties' probationary stipulation in this chronic rent delinquency holdover proceeding, by making several late payments, as well as payments for less than the stipulated amount. In this posture, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of tenant's application for post-eviction relief (see Wadsworth Ventura Assoc. v Frias, 101 AD3d 474 [2012]; Henry Hudson Gardens, L.L.C. v Bareda, 25 AD3d 466 [2006]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur


Decision Date: April 22, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman (Fourth Lenox Terrace Assoc. v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry Hudson Gardens, L.L.C. v. Bareda
25 A.D.3d 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)