Fourteenth Street & Broadway Realty Corp. v. Deutsch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fourteenth Street & Broadway Realty Corp. v. Deutsch

136 Misc. 50, 242 N.Y.S. 72, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1269

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 Misc. 50 (Fourteenth Street & Broadway Realty Corp. v. Deutsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fourteenth Street & Broadway Realty Corp. v. Deutsch, 136 Misc. 50, 242 N.Y.S. 72, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The right to recover the rent in a summary proceeding being granted by the 1924 amendment (Laws of 1924, chap. 514) to section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act, under the conditions mentioned therein — that the precept contain a notice that demand is made in the petition for a judgment for rent in arrears, and that the precept be served at least five days before the return day thereof — and the landlord conceding non-compliance with such conditions, the court had no jurisdiction to award judgment for the rent herein under the amendment of the landlord’s petition allowed at the trial. Judgment reversed.

All concur; present, Bijur, Peters and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The right to recover the rent in a summary proceeding being granted by the 1924 amendment (Laws of 1924, chap. 514) to section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act, under the conditions mentioned therein — that the precept contain a notice that demand is made in the petition for a judgment for rent in arrears, and that the precept be served at least five days before the return day thereof — and the landlord conceding non-compliance with such conditions, the court had no jurisdiction to award judgment for the rent herein under the amendment of the landlord’s petition allowed at the trial. Judgment reversed.

All concur; present, Bijur, Peters and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 Misc. 50, 242 N.Y.S. 72, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fourteenth-street-broadway-realty-corp-v-deutsch-nyappterm-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack