Fourstar v. Murlak
This text of 314 F. App'x 58 (Fourstar v. Murlak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[59]*59MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Victor Charles Fours-tar, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his request to file his action without prepayment of the full filing fee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam). We vacate and remand.
The reason given by the district court for denying Fourstar permission to file his action without prepayment, his failure to file a certified copy of his trust fund statement for the last six months, is not supported by the record. Accordingly, we remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.
No costs awarded on appeal.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
314 F. App'x 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fourstar-v-murlak-ca9-2009.