Fournier v. Columbian Manufacturing Co.

47 A. 255, 70 N.H. 629
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1900·Published

Opinion

Pike, J.

The cause of the plaintiff’s injury was the negligence of a fellow-servant, who was competent and ordinarily careful, in starting the frame without notice while the plaintiff was cleaning-the gears.

If the injury had resulted from the running of the belt from the movable to the fixed pulley and thus starting up the frame, or from the plaintiff having been required to clean the gears while they were in motion, the questions of law which the plaintiff discusses would be before the court. But it did not, and those questions are not here for consideration. The motion to direct a verdict for the defendants should have been granted.

Verdict set aside : judgment for the defendants.

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fournier v. Columbian Manufacturing Co., 47 A. 255, 70 N.H. 629 (N.H. 1900).

47 A. 255 (Fournier v. Columbian Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.