Fourcher v. Day

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Fourcher v. Day

6 La. Ann. 60

DecidedJanuary 15, 1851

StatusPublished

This text of 6 La. Ann. 60 (Fourcher v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fourcher v. Day, 6 La. Ann. 60 (La. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the court (Preston, J. recusing himself, having been of counsel in the case,) was pronounced by

Seidell, J.

We concur with the district judge in the opinion, that the payments made by the plaintiff in anticipation, are to be considered as not made with regard to the defendants, workmen and furnishers of materials. C. C. 2745. Act of 1844, sec. 6, p. 35.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court (Preston, J. recusing himself, having been of counsel in the case,) was pronounced by

Seidell, J.

We concur with the district judge in the opinion, that the payments made by the plaintiff in anticipation, are to be considered as not made with regard to the defendants, workmen and furnishers of materials. C. C. 2745. Act of 1844, sec. 6, p. 35.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 La. Ann. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fourcher-v-day-la-1851.