Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida

Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville

187 So. 908, 136 Fla. 847, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1607

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 24, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel,, and being duly considered by the Court, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record, and it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the order of the court below quashing the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissing the cause, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Terrell and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel,, and being duly considered by the Court, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record, and it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the order of the court below quashing the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissing the cause, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Terrell and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville, 187 So. 908, 136 Fla. 847, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1607 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

187 So. 908 (Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.