Four Brothers Investments LLC v. Acuity Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedJuly 24, 2025
Docket4:25-cv-00864
StatusUnknown

This text of Four Brothers Investments LLC v. Acuity Insurance Company (Four Brothers Investments LLC v. Acuity Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Four Brothers Investments LLC v. Acuity Insurance Company, (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

FOUR BROTHERS INVESTMENT LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:25 CV 864 CDP ) ACUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This recently reassigned case is before me for review of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff Four Brothers Investment LLC brings this breach of contract action in diversity alleging that defendant Acuity Insurance Company breached its insurance contract with plaintiff by failing to properly evaluate and investigate plaintiff’s claim of damage to its insured property and by failing to pay for covered damage to the property. Plaintiff also brings a claim of vexatious refusal to pay. Plaintiff invokes this Court’s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. I have reviewed plaintiff’s complaint and find that there is no adequate statement of citizenship with respect to either party to the case. I will therefore order plaintiff to file an amended complaint to properly allege this Court’s subject- matter jurisdiction. In its complaint, plaintiff identifies itself as “a Limited Liability Company registered in the State of Missouri and principally located at 10130 West Florissant

Ave, St. Louis, MO 63136.” (ECF 1 at ¶ 1.) For purposes of diversity, however, a limited liability company’s citizenship is the citizenship of all its members. GMAC Commercial Credit LLC v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827, 829

(8th Cir. 2004). Plaintiff does not identity its members, nor does it allege the members’ citizenship. As to defendant Acuity Insurance Company, plaintiff avers that it is a “domestic/foreign corporation registered and licensed to sell insurance in the State

of Missouri. Defendant’s principal address is 2800 South Taylor Drive, PO Box 58 Sheboygan, WI 53082-0058[.]” (ECF 1 at ¶ 2.) With respect to corporate defendants, however, a proper statement of citizenship includes the corporation’s

place of incorporation and its principal place of business. Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 823 F.2d 214, 216 (8th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff’s description of the defendant here is insufficient to establish its citizenship. Because there is no sufficient statement of citizenship with respect to either

party in the case, I am unable to determine if this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, I will give plaintiff seven (7) days to amend its complaint to properly allege this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. Failure to

timely comply with this Order may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Four Brothers Investment LLC shall file an amended complaint within seven (7) days of the date of this Order to properly allege this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

CATHERINE D.PERRY // UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 24th day of July, 2025.

_3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Four Brothers Investments LLC v. Acuity Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/four-brothers-investments-llc-v-acuity-insurance-company-moed-2025.