Fouquet v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fouquet v. State

580 So. 2d 347, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5355, 1991 WL 98017

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1991

DocketNo. 90-173

StatusPublished

This text of 580 So. 2d 347 (Fouquet v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fouquet v. State, 580 So. 2d 347, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5355, 1991 WL 98017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joseph Harry Fouquet, appeals from sentences for robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Appellant was convicted of first degree murder with a firearm, robbery, and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder, and concurrent fifteen year terms for the robbery and conspiracy.

Appellant’s guidelines scoresheet reflected a maximum sentence of 12-30 months incarceration for the robbery and conspiracy. Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing departure sentences without entering written reasons for the departure.

Accordingly, we remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990); Davis v. State, 560 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Finding no other errors, we affirm appellant’s convictions, and reverse and remand for resentencing as to the departure sentences for robbery and conspiracy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI