Fountain v. State
966 So. 2d 998, 2007 WL 2935041
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 2007
Docket1D07-4836
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 966 So. 2d 998 (Fountain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fountain v. State, 966 So. 2d 998, 2007 WL 2935041 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
Kevin Lamar FOUNTAIN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Kevin Lamar Fountain, pro se, Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kevin Lamar Fountain v. Ricky D. Dixon Secretary Department of Corrections
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Brown v. State
966 So. 2d 998 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
966 So. 2d 998, 2007 WL 2935041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fountain-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.