Fountain v. Ragan-Malone Co.
This text of 80 S.E. 725 (Fountain v. Ragan-Malone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The determination of the constitutionality’ of acts of the General Assembly is a matter exclusively for the Supreme Court, and the only question presented by this record depended for its solution upon the constitutionality of certain sections of the act of the General Assembly relating to the city court of Ashburn (Acts 1906, p. 150). For this reason this court certified the questions involved to the Supreme Court; and it appearing, from the answers to the certified questions, that the act in question is not, for any of the reasons assigned by the plaintiff in error, unconstitutional (141 Ga. 58, 80 S. E. 306), the trial judge did not err in entering the judgment at the appearance term, since the action was upon an unconditional contract and there was no answer under oath. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 S.E. 725, 14 Ga. App. 287, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fountain-v-ragan-malone-co-gactapp-1914.