Fountain v. Leckie
17 P. 883, 3 Wash. Terr. 407, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 5
This text of 17 P. 883 (Fountain v. Leckie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fountain v. Leckie, 17 P. 883, 3 Wash. Terr. 407, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 5 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1888).
Opinion
The defendant in error moves to affirm the judgment in the district court, “for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed and neglected to file and serve a brief herein as provided by rule 8 of this court.” The plaintiff does not appear. Let an order be made affirming the judgment below, with costs in this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 P. 883, 3 Wash. Terr. 407, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fountain-v-leckie-washterr-1888.