Fountain v. Leckie

17 P. 883, 3 Wash. Terr. 407, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 5
Washington Territory·Decided January 26, 1888·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant in error moves to affirm the judgment in the district court, “for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed and neglected to file and serve a brief herein as provided by rule 8 of this court.” The plaintiff does not appear. Let an order be made affirming the judgment below, with costs in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fountain v. Leckie, 17 P. 883, 3 Wash. Terr. 407, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 5 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1888).

17 P. 883 (Fountain v. Leckie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.