Fountain v. Carlton

103 A. 387, 88 N.J. Eq. 593, 3 Stock. 593, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 312
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 14, 1918·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, White, Gardner — -7. For reversal — Swayze, Bergen, Kalisch, Heppenheimer, Taylor — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fountain v. Carlton, 103 A. 387, 88 N.J. Eq. 593, 3 Stock. 593, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 312 (N.J. 1918).

103 A. 387 (Fountain v. Carlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sears Mortg. Corp. v. Rose
607 A.2d 1327 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Zabriskie v. Mack
29 A.2d 199 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Wilson v. Walsh
148 A. 7 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)