Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Fountain v. Carlton

Fountain v. Carlton

103 A. 387, 88 N.J. Eq. 593, 3 Stock. 593, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 312
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 14, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 A. 387 (Fountain v. Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fountain v. Carlton, 103 A. 387, 88 N.J. Eq. 593, 3 Stock. 593, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 312 (N.J. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, White, Gardner — -7. For reversal — Swayze, Bergen, Kalisch, Heppenheimer, Taylor — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sears Mortg. Corp. v. Rose
607 A.2d 1327 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Zabriskie v. Mack
29 A.2d 199 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Wilson v. Walsh
148 A. 7 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A. 387, 88 N.J. Eq. 593, 3 Stock. 593, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fountain-v-carlton-nj-1918.