Foucault v. Pinet

43 Cal. 136
California Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1872·No. No. 2,938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Niles, J.:

There is an error apparent upon the face of the report of the Commissioner. The plaintiff should have had judgment for one thousand two hundred and fifty-five dollars and sixty-five cents, with interest from its date at seven per cent per annum and costs.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foucault v. Pinet, 43 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1872).

43 Cal. 136 (Foucault v. Pinet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.
54 P. 731 (California Supreme Court, 1898)