Foucault v. Pinet

California Supreme Court

Foucault v. Pinet

43 Cal. 136

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1872

DocketNo. 2,938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 Cal. 136 (Foucault v. Pinet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foucault v. Pinet, 43 Cal. 136 (Cal. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Niles, J.:

There is an error apparent upon the face of the report of the Commissioner. The plaintiff should have had judgment for one thousand two hundred and fifty-five dollars and sixty-five cents, with interest from its date at seven per cent per annum and costs.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Niles, J.:

There is an error apparent upon the face of the report of the Commissioner. The plaintiff should have had judgment for one thousand two hundred and fifty-five dollars and sixty-five cents, with interest from its date at seven per cent per annum and costs.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Cal. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foucault-v-pinet-cal-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack