Fouad v. Riser

246 A.D.2d 508, 666 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 203
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 508 (Fouad v. Riser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fouad v. Riser, 246 A.D.2d 508, 666 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 10, 1997, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary [509]*509judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and (2) an order of the same court, dated June 2, 1997, which denied her motion for renewal and reargument of the prior motion.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated June 2, 1997, as denied that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for reargument is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated June 2, 1997, as denied that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for renewal is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 10, 1997, is reversed, on the law, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

As the parties moving for summary judgment, the defendants were required to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the underlying accident (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955; Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756). Neither the report prepared by the plaintiff’s physician nor the other evidence submitted by the defendants established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Sabella v McKain, 239 AD2d 333; Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peschanker v. Loporto
252 A.D.2d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Lubrano v. Brown
251 A.D.2d 383 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Silverstein v. DiFasano
249 A.D.2d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D.2d 508, 666 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fouad-v-riser-nyappdiv-1998.