Fotomat Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

497 F.2d 901, 87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2256, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8011
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 21, 1974·No. 73-2190·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 207 N.L.R.B. No. 65 (1973). The Board found coercive interrogation of employees who were seeking to organize a union, in violation of § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U. S.C. § 158(a)(1) (1970), and violations by discriminatory discharges of Brenda Meyers and Jewell Newton, in violation of § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act.

Petitioner seeks review only as to the order requiring reemployment of Jewell Newton.

On review of the total record; and

Finding substantial evidence on same to support the findings and conclusions of the National Labor Relations Board,

Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fotomat Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 497 F.2d 901, 87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2256, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8011 (6th Cir. 1974).

497 F.2d 901 (Fotomat Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1)