Fotianos v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Fotianos v. State

346 So. 2d 66, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3917

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 1977

DocketNo. 49844

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 346 So. 2d 66 (Fotianos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fotianos v. State, 346 So. 2d 66, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3917 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court under its conflict certiorari jurisdiction as provided by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and Fla.App. Rule 4.5c(6).

After hearing argument, we are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari heretofore granted in this cause should now be discharged. Accordingly, the writ of certio-rari is discharged.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court under its conflict certiorari jurisdiction as provided by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and Fla.App. Rule 4.5c(6).

After hearing argument, we are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari heretofore granted in this cause should now be discharged. Accordingly, the writ of certio-rari is discharged.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 So. 2d 66, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fotianos-v-state-fla-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack