Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth
This text of Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth (Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, * Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ.
DONNA FOSTER-ZAHID PER CURIAM v. Record No. 962512 September 12, 1997
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
In this case, we awarded appellant an appeal from the
judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court did
not err in ruling (1) that the trial court had jurisdiction to
try appellant for violation of Code § 18.2-49.1(A), and (2) that
Fairfax County was the proper venue in which to prosecute the
appellant for that violation. Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, 23
Va. App. 430, 477 S.E.2d 759 (1996).
We have considered these questions, and for the reasons
stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the
judgment below.
Affirmed.
* Justice Stephenson participated in the hearing and decision of this case prior to the effective date of his retirement on July 1, 1997.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-zahid-v-commonwealth-va-1997.