Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth

489 S.E.2d 687, 254 Va. 168, 1997 Va. LEXIS 102
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided September 12, 1997·No. Record No. 962512·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case, we awarded appellant an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court did not err in ruling (1) that the trial court had jurisdiction to try appellant for violation of Code § 18.2-49.1(A), and (2) that Fairfax County was the proper venue in which to prosecute the appellant for that violation. Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, 23 Va. App. 430, 477 S.E.2d 759 (1996).

We have considered these questions, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment below.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, 489 S.E.2d 687, 254 Va. 168, 1997 Va. LEXIS 102 (Va. 1997).

489 S.E.2d 687 (Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raja v. Commonwealth
581 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2003)
Tameka Ann Dunn v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2003