Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedSeptember 12, 1997
Docket962512
StatusPublished

This text of Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth (Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, (Va. 1997).

Opinion

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, * Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ.

DONNA FOSTER-ZAHID PER CURIAM v. Record No. 962512 September 12, 1997

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

In this case, we awarded appellant an appeal from the

judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court did

not err in ruling (1) that the trial court had jurisdiction to

try appellant for violation of Code § 18.2-49.1(A), and (2) that

Fairfax County was the proper venue in which to prosecute the

appellant for that violation. Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, 23

Va. App. 430, 477 S.E.2d 759 (1996).

We have considered these questions, and for the reasons

stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the

judgment below.

Affirmed.

* Justice Stephenson participated in the hearing and decision of this case prior to the effective date of his retirement on July 1, 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth
477 S.E.2d 759 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Foster-Zahid v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-zahid-v-commonwealth-va-1997.