Foster v. Warner
This text of 277 P. 1117 (Foster v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In 1918, respondent agreed with appellant for the purchase of a quantity of honey and paid $330 on the purchase price. Payment of the balance of the purchase price was not made, and the honey was sold to another. Action was thereafter instituted by respondent to recover the advance payment as well as damages by reason of the failure to deliver the honey. The cause was tried and respondent recovered judgment. On appeal, the judgment was reversed and remanded with instructions. (Foster v. Warner, 42 Ida. 729, 249 Pac. 771.) That opinion was dated July 9, 1926, and on December 3, 1926, respondent filed *568 his amended complaint for the return of the purchase money. Appellant pleaded certain damages sustained by him, and judgment was entered for respondent for the purchase money paid, less the damages. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
A careful consideration of the errors assigned has convinced us that none of them justifies a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 P. 1117, 47 Idaho 567, 1929 Ida. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-warner-idaho-1929.