Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Christopher Foster,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 1:15cv713
Ronald Edros, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility,
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on December 27, 2023 (Doc. 184). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 184) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 184) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 183) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution (Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.