Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
This text of Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution (Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Christopher Foster,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 1:15cv713
Ronald Edros, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility,
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on December 27, 2023 (Doc. 184). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 184) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 184) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 183) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-warden-toledo-correctional-institution-ohsd-2024.