Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Christopher Foster,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 1:15cv713
Ronald Erdos, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, Judge Michael R. Barrett
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 30, 2020 (Doc. 145). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 145) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 145) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) (Doc. 144) is denied for lack of jurisdiction. Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be taken in good faith and would be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution (Foster v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.