Foster v. United States

184 F.2d 571, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3134
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1950
Docket13044
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 F.2d 571 (Foster v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. United States, 184 F.2d 571, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3134 (5th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tried upon his plea of not guilty and convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for five years, the defendant appealed from the judgment and sentence. Later, abandoning the appeal, he filed a petition under Sec. 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence. His ground for doing so was that there was a violation and infringement of his constitutional right rendering the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack in this, that the defendant was denied the right to act as his own counsel and was required, contrary to his wish and desire, to accept the serv ices and assistance of counsel appointed by the court.

There was a full hearing on the petition, followed by a judgment denying the relief asked. From that judgment the defendant has appealed.

We need not determine whether, if, as appellant claims, he was denied the right to act as his own counsel, this would be a mere error which must be taken advantage of by appeal or would, as he claims, be the deprivation of a constitutional right rendering the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack. For a careful examination of the record leaves us in no doubt that defendant was not denied, but was accorded, the right to conduct his own trial and that he did, *572 with the permission of the court, in truth do so. The record makes it plain that the counsel appointed by the court did not in any way interfere with or prevent the petitioner from conducting, his trial, but, on the contrary, conferred with and assisted him in doing so.

The record standing thus, it is quite clear that no constitutional.right of the defendant was invaded or infringed, and that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hayman
342 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 F.2d 571, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-united-states-ca5-1950.