Foster v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Foster v. United States

160 F.2d 576, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2641

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 1947

DocketNo. 5568

StatusPublished

This text of 160 F.2d 576 (Foster v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. United States, 160 F.2d 576, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2641 (4th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in an illicit distilling case. The evidence unquestionably shows the operation of the distillery and the various violations of the internal revenue statutes charged in the indictment. The only question before ms is whether the connection of appellant with the illegal enterprise is sufficiently shown. We think that it is. When the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as it must be in passing upon the motion of an accused for a directed verdict, it is unquestionably sufficient to support the conclusion that appellant was actively aiding and abetting in the operation of the distillery. The appeal presents no substantial question for the decision of this court, and bail might well have been refused pending appeal if the point had been raised in the District Court. Mandate will accordingly issue forthwith.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in an illicit distilling case. The evidence unquestionably shows the operation of the distillery and the various violations of the internal revenue statutes charged in the indictment. The only question before ms is whether the connection of appellant with the illegal enterprise is sufficiently shown. We think that it is. When the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as it must be in passing upon the motion of an accused for a directed verdict, it is unquestionably sufficient to support the conclusion that appellant was actively aiding and abetting in the operation of the distillery. The appeal presents no substantial question for the decision of this court, and bail might well have been refused pending appeal if the point had been raised in the District Court. Mandate will accordingly issue forthwith.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 F.2d 576, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-united-states-ca4-1947.