Foster v. Toys "R" US—NYTEX, Inc.

191 A.D.2d 612, 595 N.Y.S.2d 327

This text of 191 A.D.2d 612 (Foster v. Toys "R" US—NYTEX, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Toys "R" US—NYTEX, Inc., 191 A.D.2d 612, 595 N.Y.S.2d 327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered February 28, 1991, which denied its motion for a change of venue from Kings County to Suffolk County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a change of venue to Suffolk County (see, CPLR 510 [3]; Weisemann v Davison, 162 AD2d 448; Filler v Cornell Univ., 147 AD2d 610; McAdoo v Levinson, 143 AD2d 819). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McAdoo v. Levinson
143 A.D.2d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Filler v. Cornell University
147 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Weisemann v. Davison
162 A.D.2d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 A.D.2d 612, 595 N.Y.S.2d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-toys-r-usnytex-inc-nyappdiv-1993.