Foster v. Therrell

145 S.E.2d 624, 112 Ga. App. 542, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 765
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 25, 1965
Docket41565
StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E.2d 624 (Foster v. Therrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Therrell, 145 S.E.2d 624, 112 Ga. App. 542, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 765 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

1. This case is controlled by the decision in King v. Skinner, 101 Ga. App. 102 (1, 2) (112 SE2d 789) and the rulings therein made that the failure of the movant, in a motion for new trial, to comply with Rule 8 of the Civil Court of Fulton County providing for two days’ written notice to opposing counsel (or waiver in writing) before submitting a brief of evidence for approval by the trial judge, is a proper ground for dismissing the motion for new trial.

2. Under the facts disclosed by the record, it does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to continue the hearing on the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Skinner
112 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.E.2d 624, 112 Ga. App. 542, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-therrell-gactapp-1965.