Foster v. . Taylor

Court of King's Bench

Foster v. . Taylor

1 N.C. 749

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 749 (Foster v. . Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. . Taylor, 1 N.C. 749 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

An ejectione firmae was brought in the Common Bench, judgment given, and error brought here. The error assigned was a variance between the plea roll and the imparlance roll. The last being of an ejectment 10 Junii, 22 Jac., and the plea roll 12 Junii, 22 Jac. But the truth was that the plea roll was entered 10 Junii, but was erased and made 12 Junii. Bramston moved for leave to amend the writ, and the court (absente CREW, C. J.) granted it, notwithstanding that the record was removed here, and error assigned thereon. Poph., 196; Bendl., 186. *Page 750

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An ejectione firmae was brought in the Common Bench, judgment given, and error brought here. The error assigned was a variance between the plea roll and the imparlance roll. The last being of an ejectment 10 Junii, 22 Jac., and the plea roll 12 Junii, 22 Jac. But the truth was that the plea roll was entered 10 Junii, but was erased and made 12 Junii. Bramston moved for leave to amend the writ, and the court (absente CREW, C. J.) granted it, notwithstanding that the record was removed here, and error assigned thereon. Poph., 196; Bendl., 186. *Page 750

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-taylor-kingsbench-1793.