Foster v. Taylor

Circuit Court of North Carolina

Foster v. Taylor

1 N.C. 162

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 1, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 162 (Foster v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. Taylor, 1 N.C. 162 (circtnc 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

AN ejectione firmæ was brought in the Common Bench, judgment given, and error brought here. The error assigned was a variance between the plea roll and the imparlance roll. The last being of an ejectment 10 Junii, 22 Jac. and the plea roll 12 Junii, 22 Jac. But the truth was that the plea-roll was entered 10 Junii, but was rased and made 12 Junii. Bramston moved for leave to amend [163]*163the writ, and the court (absente Crew, C. J.) granted it notwithstanding that the record was removed here, an error assigned thereon. Poph. 196. Bendl.186.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AN ejectione firmæ was brought in the Common Bench, judgment given, and error brought here. The error assigned was a variance between the plea roll and the imparlance roll. The last being of an ejectment 10 Junii, 22 Jac. and the plea roll 12 Junii, 22 Jac. But the truth was that the plea-roll was entered 10 Junii, but was rased and made 12 Junii. Bramston moved for leave to amend [163]*163the writ, and the court (absente Crew, C. J.) granted it notwithstanding that the record was removed here, an error assigned thereon. Poph. 196. Bendl.186.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-taylor-circtnc-1793.