Foster v. Sterling Infosystems Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided May 16, 2023·No. 4:23-cv-00034·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 8 9 Heather Danielle Foster, No. CV-23-00034-TUC-JCH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Sterling Infosystems Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 The Court enters the following Case Management Order: 16 1. Initial Disclosures. The parties shall exchange initial disclosures required under 17 Rule 26(a)1 by April 27, 2023. 18 2. Pleading Deadline. The deadline for joining parties, amending pleadings, and filing supplemental pleadings is 60 days from the date of this Order. 19 20 3. Discovery Limitations. Depositions are limited to 10 per side, seven hours each deposition as provided in Rule 30. Each side may propound up to 25 21 interrogatories, including subparts, 35 requests for production of documents, 22 including subparts, and unlimited requests for admissions, including subparts. 23 4. Fact Discovery. The deadline for completing fact discovery, including discovery 24 by subpoena, is December 15, 2023. To ensure compliance with this deadline, the 25 following rules shall apply: 26 a. Depositions: All depositions shall be scheduled to commence at least five 27 working days before the fact discovery deadline. A deposition commenced 28 1 All rules reference the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated. 1 five days before the deadline may continue up until the deadline, as 2 necessary. 3 b. Written Discovery: All interrogatories, requests for production of 4 documents, and requests for admissions shall be served at least 45 days 5 before the fact discovery deadline. 6 c. Extensions: The parties may agree in writing, without Court approval, to 7 extend the time provided for discovery responses in Rules 33, 34, and 36. 8 Such agreed-upon extensions, however, do not alter or extend the Court's 9 discovery deadlines. 10 d. Special Provisions Regarding Rule 34 Responses: Objections to Rule 34 11 document production requests shall be stated with specificity; general or 12 boilerplate objections are not permitted. Document production in response 13 to a Rule 34 request shall be completed by the time specified in the request 14 or another reasonable time specified in the response. An objection to a Rule 34 request shall state whether any responsive materials have been withheld 15 based upon that objection. 16 5. Expert Disclosures and Discovery. 17 a. Plaintiff(s) shall complete expert disclosures required under 18 Rule 26(a)(2)(A)–(C) by January 26, 2024. 19 b. Defendant(s) shall complete expert disclosures required under 20 Rule 26(a)(2)(A)–(C) by January 26, 2024. 21 c. Expert depositions shall be completed by February 16, 2024 and shall 22 commence at least five working days before that deadline. 23 d. Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2)(A) shall include the identities of treating 24 physicians and other witnesses who will provide testimony under Federal 25 Rules of Evidence 702, 703, or 705, but who are not required to provide 26 expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2)(B). Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures are 27 required for such witnesses on the dates set forth above. Rule 26(a)(2)(C) 28 disclosures shall identify not only the subjects on which the witness will 1 testify but shall also provide a summary of the facts and opinions to which 2 the expert will testify. The summary, clearly not as detailed as a 3 Rule 26(a)(2)(B) report, shall be sufficiently detailed to provide fair notice 4 of what the expert will say at trial.2 5 e. As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 26 (1993 6 Amendments), expert reports under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) shall set forth "the 7 testimony the witness is expected to present during direct examination, 8 together with the reasons therefor." Full and complete disclosures of such 9 testimony are required on the dates set forth above; absent extraordinary 10 circumstances, parties will not be permitted to supplement expert reports 11 after these dates. The Court notes, however, that it usually permits parties 12 to present opinions of their experts that were elicited by opposing counsel 13 during depositions of the experts. Counsel should depose experts with this 14 in mind. f. Each side is limited to one testifying expert witness per issue. 15 6. Expedited Procedure for Resolving Discovery and Disclosure Disputes. 16 a. The parties shall not file written discovery/disclosure motions without leave 17 of Court. This procedure applies to all disputes between parties to the 18 action that could properly be addressed in motions for protective order 19 under Rule 26(c), disclosure under Rule 37(a), or motions to compel.3 20 b. When the parties have a dispute that could properly be addressed under 21 Rule 26(c), Rule 37(a), or motions to compel, they shall file with the court 22 a joint statement of discovery/disclosure dispute. The joint statement shall 23

24 2 In Goodman v. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 2011), the Ninth Circuit held that “a treating physician is only exempt from Rule 26(a)(2)(B)’s 25 written report requirement to the extent that his opinions were formed during the course of treatment.” Id. at 826. Thus, for opinions formed outside the course of treatment, Rule 26 26(a)(2)(B) written reports are required. Id. For opinions formed during the course of treatment, Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures will suffice. 27 3 The prohibition on “written discovery motions” includes any written materials 28 delivered, emailed or faxed to the Court, including hand-delivered correspondence with attachments. 1 not exceed 3 pages of explanatory text, with each party entitled to submit 2 one and one-half pages of that text. Parties shall not file a joint statement 3 without first seeking to resolve the matter through personal consultation 4 and sincere effort as required by Local Rules of Civil Procedure 7.2(j). The 5 purposes of the joint statement are to notify the court of the dispute, and to 6 make a record of the discovery or disclosure sought. Briefing on the dispute 7 is permitted only if ordered by the Court. 8 c. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties may jointly contact the court 9 by telephone or email to request a hearing on the joint statement of 10 discovery/disclosure dispute. The Court will schedule the matter at the 11 earliest convenient time, whether by telephone or in-person. The Court may 12 order written briefing if it does not resolve the dispute during the 13 conference. Any briefing ordered by the Court shall also comply with Local 14 Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(j). d. The Court may issue a minute entry setting forth the resolution of the 15 discovery dispute. After resolution, a party may file with the Court those 16 materials necessary to create a record of the discovery or disclosure the 17 Court permitted or denied. 18 e. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not entertain fact 19 discovery disputes after the deadline for completion of fact discovery and 20 will not entertain expert discovery disputes after the deadline for 21 completion of expert discovery. 22 7. Dispositive Motions. 23 a. Dispositive motions shall be filed by March 15, 2024. Such motions shall 24 comply in all respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the 25 Local Rules. 26 b. No party shall file more than one motion for summary judgment under 27 Rule 56 without permission from the Court. 28 1 c. Statements of fact required by Local Rule of Civil Procedure 56.1 shall not 2 exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, exclusive of exhibits. 3 d. The parties shall not notice oral argument on any motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Sterling Infosystems Incorporated, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Foster v. Sterling Infosystems Incorporated (Foster v. Sterling Infosystems Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLC
644 F.3d 817 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)