Foster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Foster v. State

166 S.W.2d 927, 145 Tex. Crim. 189, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 541

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foster v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 Tex. Crim. 372 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 25, 1942·No. No. 22250·Published

Opinions

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in County Court at Law No. 2, Harris County, upon a charge of keeping a bawdy house and assessed a fine of $200.00 and twenty days in jail, from which she appeals.

[190]*190The record is before us with two bills of exception which cannot be considered because each is multifarious. Each bill presents some kind of objection to testimony given by about six different witnesses and is otherwise fatally defective.

There is no contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and we find nothing requiring further consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in County Court at Law No. 2, Harris County, upon a charge of keeping a bawdy house and assessed a fine of $200.00 and twenty days in jail, from which she appeals.

[190]*190The record is before us with two bills of exception which cannot be considered because each is multifarious. Each bill presents some kind of objection to testimony given by about six different witnesses and is otherwise fatally defective.

There is no contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and we find nothing requiring further consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Foster v. State, 166 S.W.2d 927, 145 Tex. Crim. 189, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 541 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

166 S.W.2d 927 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.