Foster v. State

98 S.W.2d 183
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1936
DocketNo. 18544
StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.W.2d 183 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. State, 98 S.W.2d 183 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of an automobile is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence heard in the trial court is not brought forward. Nothing is presented by bills of exception or otherwise which would warrant a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.W.2d 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.