Foster v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Foster v. State

914 N.E.2d 204, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1406

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2009·No. 2009-1032·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-080651. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, V, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. Cupp, J., would not accept Proposition of Law No. III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-080651. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, V, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. Cupp, J., would not accept Proposition of Law No. III.

Foster v. State, 914 N.E.2d 204, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

914 N.E.2d 204 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related