Foster v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Foster v. State

914 N.E.2d 204, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1406

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 30, 2009

Docket2009-1032

StatusPublished

This text of 914 N.E.2d 204 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. State, 914 N.E.2d 204, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-080651. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, V, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. Cupp, J., would not accept Proposition of Law No. III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-080651. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, V, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. Cupp, J., would not accept Proposition of Law No. III.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

914 N.E.2d 204, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack