Foster v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-0127 _____________________________
RODERICK T. FOSTER,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 23, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s postconviction motion and motion to rule, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Roderick T. Foster, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foster v. State of Florida (Foster v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.