Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Foster v. State

487 S.W.3d 504, 2016 WL 1578997, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 374

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102477

StatusPublished

This text of 487 S.W.3d 504 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. State, 487 S.W.3d 504, 2016 WL 1578997, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Foster filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because his trial counsel promised him that he would receive a sentence of no more than ten years by pleading guilty. The motion court denied Foster’s motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. Finding no clear error, we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not cleaiiy erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Foster filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because his trial counsel promised him that he would receive a sentence of no more than ten years by pleading guilty. The motion court denied Foster’s motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. Finding no clear error, we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not cleaiiy erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 S.W.3d 504, 2016 WL 1578997, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-moctapp-2016.