Foster v. State

184 S.W.3d 159, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 208, 2006 WL 389675
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2006·No. No. ED 86607·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel W. Foster appeals from the denial of his motion to re-open his original Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and find no error. All pending motions before this court are denied. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. State, 184 S.W.3d 159, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 208, 2006 WL 389675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

184 S.W.3d 159 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.