Foster v. State
815 S.W.2d 2, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1035, 1989 WL 251373
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foster v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 712 →
Opinion
[3]*3ORDER
Appellant, Robert H. Foster, appeals from the denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 74.06, which was styled as a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed appellant’s claim of error, the record on which it is based and the findings and conclusions of the motion court and find no error. We also have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties, has been prepared which sets forth the basis of our decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foster v. State, 815 S.W.2d 2, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1035, 1989 WL 251373 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).
815 S.W.2d 2 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.