Foster v. State

1 Morr. St. Cas. 885, 31 Miss. 421
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fishes, J.:

Tbe plaintiff in error was indicted in tbe circuit court of Madison county, under tbe statute of 1850, to suppress trade and barter with slaves, and for other purposes, and was convicted on bis trial in tbe court below.

On looking into the record, we deem it unnecessary to decide the points made by tbe attorney-general, on behalf of tbe state, in argument at the bar, as it does not appear by the record, that tbe grand jury, who found tbe indictment,"were in any manner sworn to inquire in and for the body of the county of Madison. 1

This is not now an open question in this court.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. State, 1 Morr. St. Cas. 885, 31 Miss. 421 (Mich. 1872).

1 Morr. St. Cas. 885 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wooten v. State
125 So. 103 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Hardy v. State
51 So. 460 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)
Hays v. State
50 So. 557 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)
State v. Hurst
99 S.W. 820 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Lyman v. People
7 Ill. App. 345 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1880)