Foster v. State
This text of 117 S.E. 677 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, with a recommendation by the jury that he be punished as for a misdemeanor. The recommendation of the jury was approved by the trial judge. The evidence amply authorized the [275]*275verdict; and the charge of the court was full and fair, and not subject to the objections raised to it in the motion for a new trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 S.E. 677, 30 Ga. App. 274, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-gactapp-1923.