Foster v. State

117 S.E. 677, 30 Ga. App. 274, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 396
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1923
Docket14388
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 677 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. State, 117 S.E. 677, 30 Ga. App. 274, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, with a recommendation by the jury that he be punished as for a misdemeanor. The recommendation of the jury was approved by the trial judge. The evidence amply authorized the [275]*275verdict; and the charge of the court was full and fair, and not subject to the objections raised to it in the motion for a new trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided May 15, 1923. Porter & Mebme, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Taylor, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 677, 30 Ga. App. 274, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-gactapp-1923.