Foster v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Foster v. State

110 S.E. 416, 27 Ga. App. 650, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 347

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1921

Docket12863

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 416 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. State, 110 S.E. 416, 27 Ga. App. 650, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendants were convicted of the offeus of robbery by force. The evidence fully authorized the verdict. The excerpts from the charge of the court, as complained of, were not erroneous for any reason assigned. The exception to the refusal of the court to give certain requested instructions to the jury cannot be considered, as it does not appear that the request was tendered to the court before the jury retired to consider their verdict. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendants were convicted of the offeus of robbery by force. The evidence fully authorized the verdict. The excerpts from the charge of the court, as complained of, were not erroneous for any reason assigned. The exception to the refusal of the court to give certain requested instructions to the jury cannot be considered, as it does not appear that the request was tendered to the court before the jury retired to consider their verdict. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.E. 416, 27 Ga. App. 650, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-gactapp-1921.