Foster v. State

56 So. 3d 54, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1517, 2011 WL 409001
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2011
DocketNo. 4D10-1356
StatusPublished

This text of 56 So. 3d 54 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. State, 56 So. 3d 54, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1517, 2011 WL 409001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Roker v. State, 25 So.3d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Logan v. State, 1 [55]*55So.3d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Because appellant’s filings have become successive, repetitive and frivolous, we also affirm the trial court’s entry of a Spencer order. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logan v. State
1 So. 3d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
ROKER v. State
25 So. 3d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 So. 3d 54, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1517, 2011 WL 409001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.