Foster v. State

56 So. 3d 54, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1517, 2011 WL 409001
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2011·No. No. 4D10-1356·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Roker v. State, 25 So.3d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Logan v. State, 1 [55] So.3d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Because appellant’s filings have become successive, repetitive and frivolous, we also affirm the trial court’s entry of a Spencer order. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. State, 56 So. 3d 54, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1517, 2011 WL 409001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

56 So. 3d 54 (Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
1 So. 3d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
ROKER v. State
25 So. 3d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)