Foster v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Foster v. State

873 S.W.2d 153, 316 Ark. 438

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 21, 1994

DocketCR 94-229

StatusPublished

This text of 873 S.W.2d 153 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foster v. State, 873 S.W.2d 153, 316 Ark. 438 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Bryon Foster, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, William Luppen, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dudley and Corbin, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI