Foster v. State
This text of 500 P.2d 246 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alaska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
This case is one of the series of drug cases which were presented to the grand jury in Fairbanks at the same time as the cases of Burkholder v. State, 491 P.2d 754 (Alaska 1971), and Taggard v. State, 500 P.2d 238 (Alaska, August 11, 1972). The decision herein is controlled by the opinions filed in Burkholder and Taggard. The only witness to appear before the grand jury in this case was a police officer who testified that an unidentified informant had purchased narcotic drugs from appellant and had witnessed a third sale. No evidence concerning the informant’s credibility was presented. The conviction is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
500 P.2d 246, 1972 Alas. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-alaska-1972.