Foster v. State

332 So. 2d 399, 1976 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1864
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMay 18, 1976
Docket7 Div. 440
StatusPublished

This text of 332 So. 2d 399 (Foster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. State, 332 So. 2d 399, 1976 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1864 (Ala. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinions

SIMMONS, Supernumerary Circuit Judge.

A jury heard the evidence on a plea of not guilty and convicted defendant of burglary in the second degree pursuant to an indictment therefor. The trial court fixed punishment at three years in the penitentiary. Judgment was duly entered, and this appeal in forma pauperis followed.

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

It appears that the court reporter’s certificate to the transcript of the evidence is qualified and fails to meet the requirements of Title 7, § 827(1), Recompiled Code 1958.

[400]*400The defendant filed his motion in this Court to reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial because of such inadequate certification.

The Court remanded the cause to the trial court, under Rule 10(f), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, for the purpose of determining and correcting any errors or omissions in the transcript of the trial proceeding. The trial court held a hearing after notice to the parties.

The court determined and reported to this Court after said hearing, “. that there are no errors or omissions in the transcript of the trial proceedings in said cause, and that said transcript is correct and complete.” Such judgment appears here in a certified copy of the order filed with the clerk of the Circuit Court of Calhoun County on March 5, 1976.

We will treat the transcript of the evidence, insufficiently certified by the court reporter, as full and complete.

The motion of appellant to reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial because of the inadequacy of the reporter’s certificate is overruled and denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garner v. State
298 So. 2d 630 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 So. 2d 399, 1976 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-state-alacrimapp-1976.