Foster v. Snow

199 N.Y.S.3d 462, 221 A.D.3d 405, 2023 NY Slip Op 05537
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 2023
DocketIndex No. 801288/21E Appeal No. 968 Case No. 2023-01236
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 199 N.Y.S.3d 462 (Foster v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Snow, 199 N.Y.S.3d 462, 221 A.D.3d 405, 2023 NY Slip Op 05537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Foster v Snow (2023 NY Slip Op 05537)
Foster v Snow
2023 NY Slip Op 05537
Decided on November 02, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: November 02, 2023
Before: Oing, J.P., Moulton, González, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.

Index No. 801288/21E Appeal No. 968 Case No. 2023-01236

[*1]Cordia Foster et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v

Ian K. Snow et al., Defendants-Appellants.


Mantel McDonough Riso, LLP, New York (Gerard A. Riso of counsel), for appellants.

Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas, Harrison (Scott A. Lucas of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered February 22, 2023, which denied defendants' motion to compel plaintiffs to produce documents and interrogatory responses related to their prior and subsequent employment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants' motion to compel plaintiffs to produce the requested documents and interrogatory responses related to plaintiffs' compensation by their previous and subsequent employers (see 148 Magnolia, LLC v Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 62 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2009]). Defendants failed to show that this discovery was relevant and necessary to their defense of plaintiffs' claims that they failed to pay plaintiffs overtime wages in violation of the New York Labor Law (see Molina v Two Bros. Scrap Metal, Inc., 189 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2020]; Rosas v Alice's Tea Cup, LLC, 127 F Supp 3d 4, 11 [SD NY 2015]; cf. Currid v Valea, 184 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2020]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: November 2, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Espinoza v. A S K Std. Tr. Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 02144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
US Pony Holdings, LLC v. Fashion Footwear LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 31089(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.Y.S.3d 462, 221 A.D.3d 405, 2023 NY Slip Op 05537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-snow-nyappdiv-2023.