Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided August 13, 2021·No. 18-1540·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1540V UNPUBLISHED

LADONNA FOSTER, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: July 13, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA)

Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Petitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On October 4, 2018, Ladonna Foster filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she sustained the first symptom or manifestation of the onset of a right Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on October 5, 2015. Alternatively, Petitioner alleges that she suffered neuritis or some other right shoulder injury that was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine. Petition at 3, 7-8; Stipulation, filed at July 13, 2021, ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her alleged injury for more than six months. Petition at 6; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a Table SIRVA within the Table timeframe, and denies that the flu vaccine in fact caused her alleged neuritis or any other right shoulder injury and residual effects, or any other injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on July 13, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $32,500.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) LADONNA FOSTER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. l 8- l 540V (ECF) v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

l. LaDonna Foster ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly sustained following

petitioner's receipt of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine

Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F .R. § l 00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccine on October 5, 2015.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that following her receipt of the above-referenced flu vaccine,

she sustained the first symptom or manifestation of onset of a right Shoulder Injury Related to

Vaccine Administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table. Alternatively,

petitioner alleges that she suffered neuritis or some other right shoulder injury that was caused-

in-fact by the above-referenced flu vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the

residual effects of her alleged injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil

action for damages as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a Table SIRVA within the Table

timeframe, and denies that the flu vaccine in fact caused her alleged neuritis or any other right

shoulder injury and residual effects, or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that

the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U .S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)(]), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $32,500.00 in the fonn of a check payable to petitioner, LaDonna Foster, which amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

I 0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- l 5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a