Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 10, 2017·No. 16-1484·Unpublished

Opinion

REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION 10 APR 2017 OSM U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

3Jn tbe mlniteb ~tates Qrourt of jfeberal Qrlaims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1484 FILED Filed: March 13, 2017 MAR 13 2017 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * U.S. COURT OF STEPHANIE FOSTER, * FEDERAL CLAIMS * Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders * V. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Order Concluding Proceedings. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS'

On February 10, 20 17, Petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above- captioned case.

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a) the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 2 l (a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Special Master

1 This decision shall be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). As provided by Vaccine Rule J 8(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction "of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar fi les, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy." Vaccine Rule 18(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Foster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501