Foster v. Reddick

48 So. 666, 159 Ala. 668
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 21, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 48 So. 666 (Foster v. Reddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Reddick, 48 So. 666, 159 Ala. 668 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

Dowdell, J.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of Foster, et al. v. Carlisle, et al., 159 Ala. 621, 48 South. 665.

Tyson, O. J., and Anderson and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. Carlisle
48 So. 665 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 So. 666, 159 Ala. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-reddick-ala-1909.