Foster v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance
This text of 240 S.E.2d 144 (Foster v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Foster enumerates as error the judgment of the trial court, framed in accordance with an auditor’s report. We find the appeal to be meritless. Neither proper exception to the report nor motion for recommital having been made, it became the duty of the trial court to enter the decree consistent with the auditor’s decision. Code § 10-407.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 S.E.2d 144, 143 Ga. App. 792, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-pennsylvania-millers-mutual-insurance-gactapp-1977.