Foster v. Myers

117 P. 806, 59 Or. 549, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 175
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 26, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 117 P. 806 (Foster v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Myers, 117 P. 806, 59 Or. 549, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 175 (Or. 1911).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. In our opinion chapter 34 of the Laws of 1907 (Sections 4406-4424, L. O. L. inclusive), providing for the creation of juvenile courts and prescribing the practice therein, is, in so far as it relates to those subjects, complete in itself, and the general statutes relating to appeals from the county courts have no application. Section 18 declares that “this act shall be liberally construed to the end that its purpose may be carried out; to wit, that the care, custody and discipline of a child shall approximate, as near as may be, that which should be given by its parents.” This purpose would be to a great extent frustrated if the orders of the court in relation to such care and custody could be interfered with, and delayed by appeals by persons claiming to be interested. No right of appeal having been provided by the act none exists as to this proceeding.

2. Appellant, having defaulted in the original proceedings taken to declare-the child dependent and abandoned, ceased to have any right to its custody, and thereafter her legal rights in regard to it were no greater than those of any other person who might ask the court for leave to take the child and care for it.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of Pima
404 P.2d 721 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1965)
Baker v. Nielsen
54 P.2d 309 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1936)
Cohn v. State Tax Commission
245 P. 1085 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
Hills v. Pierce
231 P. 652 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
State ex rel. Gray v. Webster
211 P. 274 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)
Sibert v. Ramsey
193 P. 17 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 P. 806, 59 Or. 549, 1911 Ore. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-myers-or-1911.