Foster v. Mijon III LLC
This text of 31 F. App'x 559 (Foster v. Mijon III LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Because the district court correctly found that the Fosters’ business, B&D [560]*560Painting, acted as an independent contractor, and because Title VII and the Arizona Civil Rights Act protect employees, not independent contractors, see Adcock v. Chrysler Corp., 166 F.3d 1290, 1292 (9th Cir.1999); see also St. Luke’s Health System v. Arizona Dept. of Law, Civil Rights Div., 180 Ariz. 373, 884 P.2d 259, 263-64 (1994), we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the Fosters’ claims under those sections.
Likewise, we hold that the district court correctly found that the Arizona state law tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress requires much more outrageous conduct than the Fosters alleged, and we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to that claim, as well.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 F. App'x 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-mijon-iii-llc-ca9-2002.