Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corp.

Second Circuit

Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corp.

410 F.2d 12

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 20, 1969·No. Nos. 357-361, Dockets 32969-32973·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edmund L. Palmieri, J., holding certain claims of Patent No. 2,-882,384, issued to plaintiff Julius E. Foster, valid and infringed by American Machine & Foundry Company and other named defendants. On appeal, defendants do not contest the validity and enforceability of the patent and raise only the issue whether they infringed. We have considered the briefs and arguments in this court and see no basis for disturbing Judge Palmieri’s findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to infringement. On that issue, we affirm on the basis of his careful opinion. 297 F.Supp. 512.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edmund L. Palmieri, J., holding certain claims of Patent No. 2,-882,384, issued to plaintiff Julius E. Foster, valid and infringed by American Machine & Foundry Company and other named defendants. On appeal, defendants do not contest the validity and enforceability of the patent and raise only the issue whether they infringed. We have considered the briefs and arguments in this court and see no basis for disturbing Judge Palmieri’s findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to infringement. On that issue, we affirm on the basis of his careful opinion. 297 F.Supp. 512.

Judgment affirmed.

Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corp., 410 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

410 F.2d 12 (Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related