Foster v. Hughes

51 How. Pr. 20
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 How. Pr. 20 (Foster v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Hughes, 51 How. Pr. 20 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Opinion

Donohue, J.

Courts of equity, or exercising equitable powers, will at all times prevent the improper use, even in a legal way, of their process, and have the power to prevent inequitable consequences of the assertion of even a legal right.

In this case it is clear to me that, while the denial of the plaintiff is made strongly, it is not true, but that, at the bottom, this mortgage is being used to obtain an end different from what is the right of the parties. On the payment of the plaintiff’s demand, with interest and costs, he will obtain all that the law or equity entitles him to, and there can be no excuse for him to refuse an assignment of the mortgage. Hpon making such tender to him, if he refuses to assign, his proceedings in this action are stayed.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Citizens' Savings Bank
8 L.R.A. 553 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1890)
Lippincott v. Lasher
44 N.J. Eq. 120 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 How. Pr. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-hughes-nysupct-1874.